One
hundred years ago, an obscure German physicist named Albert Einstein
presented to the Prussian Academy of Science his general theory of
relativity. Nothing prior had prepared scientists for such a radical
re-envisioning of the foundations of reality. Encoded in a
set of neat compact equations was the idea that our universe is
constructed from a sort of magical mesh, now known as 'spacetime'.
According to the theory, the structure of this mesh would be revealed in
the bending of light around distant stars.
To everyone at the
time, this seemed implausible, for physicists had long known that light
travels in straight lines. Yet in 1919 observations of a solar eclipse
revealed that on a cosmic scale light does bend, and overnight Einstein
became a superstar.
Einstein is said to have reacted nonchalantly
to the news that his theory had been verified. When asked how he’d have
reacted if it hadn’t been, he replied: "I would have felt sorry for the
dear Lord. The theory is correct."
What made him so secure in
this judgement was the extreme elegance of his equations: how could
something so beautiful not be right?
The quantum theorist Paul
Dirac would latter sum up this attitude to physics when he borrowed from
poet John Keats, declaring that, vis-à-vis our mathematical
descriptions of nature, "beauty is truth, and truth beauty".
Art of science
A
quest for beauty has been a part of the tradition of physics throughout
its history. And in this sense, general relativity is the culmination
of a specific set of aesthetic concerns. Symmetry, harmony, a sense of
unity and wholeness, these are some of the ideals general relativity
formalises. Where quantum theory is a jumpy jazzy mash-up, general
relativity is a stately waltz.
As we celebrate its centenary, we
can applaud the theory not only as a visionary piece of science but also
as an artistic triumph.
What do we mean by the word "art"?
Lots
of answers have been proposed to this question and many more will be
given. A provocative response comes from the poet-painter Merrily
Harpur, who has noted that "the duty of artists everywhere is to enchant
the conceptual landscape". Rather than identifying art with any
material methods or practices, Harpur allies it with a sociological
outcome. Artists, she says, contribute something bewitching to our
mental experience.
It may not be the duty of scientists to
enchant our conceptual landscape, yet that is one of the goals science
can achieve; and no scientific idea has been more enrapturing than
Einstein’s. Though he advised there’d never be more than 12 people who’d
understand his theory, as with many conceptual artworks, you don’t have
to understand all of relativity to be moved by it.
In essence
the theory gives us a new understanding of gravity, one that is
preternaturally strange. According to general relativity, planets and
stars sit within, or withon, a kind of cosmic fabric - spacetime - which
is often illustrated by an analogy to a trampoline.
Imagine a
bowling ball sitting on a trampoline; it makes a depression on the
surface. Relativity says this is what a planet or star does to the web
of spacetime. Only you have to think of the surface as having four
dimensions rather than two.
Now applying the concept of spacetime
to the whole cosmos, and taking into account the gravitational affect
of all the stars and galaxies within it, physicists can use Einstein’s
equations to determine the structure of the universe itself. It gives us
a blueprint of our cosmic architecture.
Synthesis
Einstein
began his contemplations with what he called gedunken (or thought)
experiments; "what if?" scenarios that opened out his thinking in wildly
new directions. He praised the value of such intellective play in his
famous comment that "imagination is more important than knowledge".
The quote continues with an adage many artists might endorse: "Knowledge is finite, imagination encircles the world."
But
imagination alone wouldn’t have produced a set of equations whose
accuracy has now been verified to many orders of magnitude, and which
today keeps GPS satellites accurate. Thus Einstein also drew upon
another wellspring of creative power: mathematics.
As it
happened, mathematicians had been developing formidable techniques for
describing non-Euclidean surfaces, and Einstein realised he could apply
these tools to physical space. Using Riemannian geometry, he developed a
description of the world in which spacetime becomes a dynamic membrane,
bending, curving and flexing like a vast organism.
Where the
Newtonian cosmos was a static featureless void, the Einsteinian universe
is a landscape, constantly in flux, riven by titanic forces and
populated by monsters. Among them: pulsars shooting out giant jets of
x-rays and light-eating black holes, where inside the maw of an 'event
horizon', the fabric of spacetime is ripped apart.
One mark of an
important artist is the degree to which he or she stimulates other
creative thinkers. General relativity has been woven into the DNA of
science fiction, giving us the warp drives of Star Trek, the wormhole in
Carl Sagan’s Contact, and countless other narrative marvels. Novels,
plays, and a Philip Glass symphony have riffed on its themes.
At a
time when there is increasing desire to bridge the worlds of art and
science, general relativity reminds us there is artistry in science.
Creative
leaps here are driven both by playful speculation and by the ludic
powers of logic. As the 19th century mathematician John Playfair
remarked in response to the bizzarities of non-Euclidean geometry, "we
become aware how much further reason may sometimes go than imagination
may dare to follow".
In general relativity, reason and imagination combine to synthesise a whole that neither alone could achieve.
No comments:
Post a Comment